Paws behind bars logo of the Wisconsin Puppy Mill Project, Inc.

WISCONSIN PUPPY MILL PROJECT

AB-793/SB-580, Revisions to Chapter 173 (Animal Seizure Law)

Memo from the Dane County Humane Society

One of the dogs confiscated from Thyme and Sage Ranch.
(Click on photo for a larger view)

What Is A Puppy Mill?   *   What Can I Do About It?   *   Laws/Legislation   *   ACTION ALERTS!

 

 pawprint bullet point   Overview   pawprint bullet point   Summary of AB-793/SB-580   pawprint bullet point   FAQ   pawprint bullet point

 pawprint bullet point   AB-793 Revision of Chapter 173 (pdf)   pawprint bullet point   Existing WI Chapter 173 (pdf)   pawprint bullet point

 pawprint bullet point   History of Assembly Bill 793   pawprint bullet point   History of Senate Bill 580   pawprint bullet point


 

Former fighting pitbull from another cruelty case        On June 14, 2006, the FBI executed a U.S. Department of Justice search warrant on the property of Robert Lowery, looking for evidence related to drug trafficking. Lowery was arrested on drug charges and held without bail. The authorities discovered and seized 48 pit bulls housed on the Lowery property - dogs that had allegedly been involved in dog fighting. While Lowery remained in custody, state law enforcement officials gathered the necessary evidence and charged Lowery and his wife Julie in December of 2006 with dog fighting under 951.08, Wis. Stats., a full six months after the dogs had been seized.

       In accordance with a contract between Dane County and the Dane County Humane Society ("DCHS"), Lowery's dogs were held at DCHS pending resolution of the criminal dog fighting charges. As the state and federal criminal cases proceeded, Lowery's attorneys filed a petition under Chapter 173 of the Wisconsin Statutes (a civil statute) seeking the return of his dogs. In January 2007, the Dane County Circuit Court heard the case. Subsequently, in March 2007 the DCHS, Dane County and the Lowerys settled the civil matter, with the Lowerys agreeing to surrender the dogs in return for a dismissal of charges and a waiver of costs. From the day that the dogs were seized to the day of the settlement, DCHS incurred well over $200,000 in costs. This figure doesn't include the cost of the original seizure or the attorney fees from the court action. To help with the costs, Dane County included a special $100,000 appropriation in its 2007 budget specifically to help DCHS with the expenses related to the Lowery's pit bulls.

       As a result of this experience, DCHS and Dane County, in association with many other local governments, state prosecutors, humane societies, and non-profits located around the state that have experienced the financial and other adverse consequences associated with animal seizure cases, have sought to have Chapter 173 modified from its current form.

       AB-793/SB-580 has been introduced in order to make these situations less onerous on county governments and private and public animal shelters, as well as less stressful for the animals themselves. Among other things, the proposed legislation will:

One of the 300+ dogs seized from Thyme and Sage Ranch on 19 May 2009.
  • Change current state law to provide clearer rules enabling a court to require that an owner of an animal who is the subject of a Chapter 173 seizure or a Chapter 951 criminal case, to pay for the reasonable costs of custody and care for the animal.

  • Change current state law to allow local animal shelters working under contract with a political subdivision and having custodial control of an animal impounded under Chapter 173 to directly petition a court for an early disposition of the civil matter.

  • Change current state law by setting reasonable time limits for the court to act on certain items related to any animal seizure and for the owner to respond to various steps in order to expedite the entire disposition process under Chapter 173.

  • Change current state law by removing the requirement that an animal alleged to have been involved in fighting be maintained in custody pending the outcome of any criminal charges, and instead allow that the animal be retained in custody for a period that is reasonable to allow the collection of evidence relating to the animal.

 pawprint bullet point   Summary of AB-793/SB-580   pawprint bullet point


 

 pawprint bullet point   Overview   pawprint bullet point   AB-793/SB-580, Revisions to Chapter 173: DCHS Memo   pawprint bullet point   Bill Summary   pawprint bullet point   FAQ   pawprint bullet point

 pawprint bullet point   AB-793 Revision of Chapter 173 (pdf)   pawprint bullet point   Existing WI Chapter 173 (pdf)   pawprint bullet point

 pawprint bullet point   History of Assembly Bill 793   pawprint bullet point   History of Senate Bill 580   pawprint bullet point

 
What Is A Puppy Mill?
What Can I Do?
Laws/ Legislation

 


Home   *   Contact Us   *   Site Map 

What is a Puppy Mill?   *   What YOU Can Do   *   Laws/Legislation   *   Action Alerts

Thorp Dog Auctions   *   Puppy Mill Survivors   *   Photo Album

Guide to Finding a Pet   *    Breeders With Pride   *   Drive To Save Lives!

 

© Copyright, 2009. The Wisconsin Puppy MIll Project
P.O. Box 926    *    Sheboygan, WI 53082-0926   *   info@NoWisconsinPuppyMills.com

Website design by Hook & Web Designs